Tag Archive

Posted By 43templerow 43templerow

comments 0 comments

Immigration analysis: The Supreme Court’s decision on the minimum income requirement (MIR) for partners of non-European Economic Area (EEA) nationals seeking leave to enter is considered by Tony Muman, barrister, at 43 Temple Row Chambers.

Do you earn enough—Article 8, section 55 and the minimum income requirement (R (on the application of MM (Lebanon)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and other cases)

An informal event designed for conversation and networking, rather than a formal lecture, attendees will be provided with a written…

Continue Reading →

Posted By 43templerow 43templerow

comments 0 comments

Following, Jonathan Bott’s successful lecture at Community Care Live in Birmingham last year, he has recently provided an article for Community Care Inform, the online resource for social work professionals entitled ‘A barristers tips for giving evidence in family cases’. The article is designed to assist social workers when giving evidence and a copy can be accessed here.

This article was published on Community Care Inform – an online resource for social work professionals, which provides guidance and tools, research and legal information to enable robust evidence-based practice…

Continue Reading →

Posted By 43templerow 43templerow

comments 0 comments

The Supreme Court has dismissed the Government’s Appeal in R (on the application of Miller), AB Parties v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union.

In what has been described as one of the most important constitutional cases for generations, Mr Tony Muman with the assistance of Mr Thomas Green, both of 43 Temple Row Chambers, represented the AB parties in this judicial review to determine the need for Parliamentary authority to give notice of withdrawal from the EU under Article 50(1) of the…

Continue Reading →

Posted By 43templerow 43templerow

comments 0 comments

Jonathan Bott attended Community Care Live Conference at the ICC in Birmingham.

Please see link below for the Powerpoint Presentation.

Balance Sheet Approach for Court Proceedings

© Jonathan Bott – 43 Temple Row Chambers – May 2016

Continue Reading →

08

Feb

2016

Posted By 43templerow 43templerow

comments 0 comments

Barrister’s Clerk

Location:              Birmingham

Salary:                   17 – 20K plus incentive scheme depending on experience and final job description.

Closing date:      4 March 2016

 

43templerow Chambers

Barrister’s Clerk – Family, Civil and Immigration

 

43templerow Chambers are seeking to recruit a motivated junior clerk who will be responsible for the general clerking of 12 Barristers practising in the fields of civil, family and immigration.  Duties will include diary and case management, fee negotiation and fee collection.

The successful applicant must be able…

Continue Reading →

Posted By 43templerow 43templerow

comments 0 comments

Tony Muman recently wrote an article for LexisNexis following the outcome of the Bibi case at the Supreme Court which can be viewed by clicking on the link below.

To instruct Tony Muman on any public law or immigration matter, please contact his clerks.

The pre-entry English requirement for partners and article 8

Continue Reading →

14

Jan

2014

Posted By 43templerow 43templerow

comments 0 comments

As part of 43templerow’s ongoing commitment to advising members of the public and businesses via the Direct Access scheme, all our barristers who undertake Direct Access work will be attending top up training run by the Bar Council in the coming months. To find out more about Direct Access click here.

Continue Reading →

Posted By 43templerow 43templerow

comments 0 comments

“You cannot build anything on the foundation of caste. You cannot build up a nation. You cannot build up a morality. Anything that you will build on the foundation of caste will crack and will never be a whole.”

Dr. Bhimrao Ramji Ambedkar, the Father of the Indian Constitution

On 1 March 2013 the Minister for Women and Equalities announced in Parliament that she would not be exercising her Ministerial power/prerogative contained in section 9(5)(a) of the Equality Act 2010 to treat…

Continue Reading →