Tag Archive

Posted By 43templerow 43templerow

comments 0 comments

Immigration analysis: The Supreme Court’s decision on the minimum income requirement (MIR) for partners of non-European Economic Area (EEA) nationals seeking leave to enter is considered by Tony Muman, barrister, at 43 Temple Row Chambers.

Do you earn enough—Article 8, section 55 and the minimum income requirement (R (on the application of MM (Lebanon)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and other cases)

An informal event designed for conversation and networking, rather than a formal lecture, attendees will be provided with a written…

Continue Reading →

Posted By 43templerow 43templerow

comments 0 comments

Following, Jonathan Bott’s successful lecture at Community Care Live in Birmingham last year, he has recently provided an article for Community Care Inform, the online resource for social work professionals entitled ‘A barristers tips for giving evidence in family cases’. The article is designed to assist social workers when giving evidence and a copy can be accessed here.

This article was published on Community Care Inform – an online resource for social work professionals, which provides guidance and tools, research and legal information to enable robust evidence-based practice…

Continue Reading →

Posted By 43templerow 43templerow

comments 0 comments

The Supreme Court has dismissed the Government’s Appeal in R (on the application of Miller), AB Parties v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union.

In what has been described as one of the most important constitutional cases for generations, Mr Tony Muman with the assistance of Mr Thomas Green, both of 43 Temple Row Chambers, represented the AB parties in this judicial review to determine the need for Parliamentary authority to give notice of withdrawal from the EU under Article 50(1) of the…

Continue Reading →

Posted By 43templerow 43templerow

comments 0 comments

Full Article 50 High Court judgment available here.

Tony Muman of Counsel instructed on behalf of AB Parties with the assistance of Thomas Green.

Further details to follow.

Continue Reading →

Posted By 43templerow 43templerow

comments 0 comments

Jonathan Bott attended Community Care Live Conference at the ICC in Birmingham.

Please see link below for the Powerpoint Presentation.

Balance Sheet Approach for Court Proceedings

© Jonathan Bott – 43 Temple Row Chambers – May 2016

Continue Reading →

Posted By 43templerow 43templerow

comments 0 comments

Supreme Court grants Permission to Appeal against ‘Deport First Appeal Later’ provision

The Supreme Court (Lords Kerr, Reed and Toulson) has today granted permission to appeal in R (Byndloss) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] EWCA Civ 1020. The Court of Appeal judgment is at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2015/1020.html

The appeal concerns the correct interpretation of the new ‘deport first, appeal later’ rules under section 94B of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002.

Section 94B gives the Secretary of State the power to certify the…

Continue Reading →

14

Mar

2016

Posted By 43templerow 43templerow

comments 0 comments

43templerow are delighted to welcome Jonathan Bott to our expanding Family Team. Jonathan has been a solicitor and head of a provincial family law team for over 20 years.

Jonathan was a member of the Law Society’s Children Panel (since 1998), Family Law Panel (since 1998) and Family Law Panel Advanced (since the panel’s inception in 2002) where he practised in all areas of family law, but predominantly, public and private child law.

Please follow the link to see Jonathan’s profile.

All members of the family team provide advice and…

Continue Reading →

Posted By 43templerow 43templerow

comments 0 comments

 

Following a recommendation in the Report of the Costs Review Group to the Senior President of the Tribunal in December 2011, costs in the First Tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) can now be awarded in the following circumstances:

Where wasted costs have been incurred; or Where costs have been incurred by one party where a person has acted unreasonably in bringing, defending, or conducting proceedings; or In a land registration case.

Jurisdiction is conferred on the Tribunal pursuant section 29(4) of the Tribunal Courts and…

Continue Reading →